{"id":115792,"date":"2016-11-02T14:51:42","date_gmt":"2016-11-02T13:51:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/c-j-u-e-3-decembre-2015-arret-quenon\/"},"modified":"2019-08-29T11:50:00","modified_gmt":"2019-08-29T09:50:00","slug":"cgue-sentenza-quenon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\/","title":{"rendered":"C.G.U.E., 3 dicembre 2015, sentenza \u201cQuenon\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"

La Cor\u00adte di Giu\u00adsti\u00adzia del\u00adl\u2019U\u00adnio\u00adne euro\u00adpea ha rispo\u00adsto a una que\u00adstio\u00adne pre\u00adgiu\u00addi\u00adzia\u00adle rela\u00adti\u00adva al dirit\u00adto bel\u00adga del con\u00adtrat\u00adto di agen\u00adzia com\u00admer\u00adcia\u00adle in una sen\u00adten\u00adza del 03\/12\/2015 sul cumu\u00adlo di risar\u00adci\u00admen\u00adto del\u00adl\u2019a\u00adgen\u00adte licenziato :<\/p>\n

\n

Rin\u00advio pre\u00adgiu\u00addi\u00adzia\u00adle \u2013 Agen\u00adti com\u00admer\u00adcia\u00adli indi\u00adpen\u00adden\u00adti \u2013 Diret\u00adti\u00adva 86\/653\/CEE \u2013 Arti\u00adco\u00adlo 17, para\u00adgra\u00adfo 2 \u2013 Riso\u00adlu\u00adzio\u00adne di un con\u00adtrat\u00adto di agen\u00adzia da par\u00adte del pre\u00adpo\u00adnen\u00adte \u2013 Inden\u00adniz\u00adzo dell\u2019agente \u2013 Divie\u00adto di cumu\u00adlo dei siste\u00admi dell\u2019indennit\u00e0 di clien\u00adte\u00adla e del\u00adla ripa\u00adra\u00adzio\u00adne del dan\u00adno \u2013 Dirit\u00adto dell\u2019agente ad un risar\u00adci\u00admen\u00adto ulte\u00adrio\u00adre rispet\u00adto all\u2019indennit\u00e0 di clien\u00adte\u00adla \u2013 Presupposti<\/p>\n

[\u2026]\n

<\/a>35 Alla luce di quan\u00adto pre\u00adce\u00adde, occor\u00adre rispon\u00adde\u00adre alla pri\u00adma que\u00adstio\u00adne dichia\u00adran\u00addo che l\u2019articolo 17, para\u00adgra\u00adfo 2, del\u00adla diret\u00adti\u00adva [86\/653\/CEE del Con\u00adsi\u00adglio, del 18 dicem\u00adbre 1986, rela\u00adti\u00adva al coor\u00addi\u00adna\u00admen\u00adto dei dirit\u00adti degli Sta\u00adti mem\u00adbri con\u00adcer\u00adnen\u00adti gli agen\u00adti com\u00admer\u00adcia\u00adli indi\u00adpen\u00adden\u00adti] deve esse\u00adre inter\u00adpre\u00adta\u00adto nel sen\u00adso che non osta ad una nor\u00adma\u00adti\u00adva nazio\u00adna\u00adle che dispo\u00adne che l\u2019agente com\u00admer\u00adcia\u00adle ha dirit\u00adto, all\u2019atto dell\u2019estinzione del con\u00adtrat\u00adto di agen\u00adzia, sia ad un\u2019indennit\u00e0 di clien\u00adte\u00adla di un impor\u00adto mas\u00adsi\u00admo limi\u00adta\u00adto a un anno del\u00adla sua retri\u00adbu\u00adzio\u00adne sia, lad\u00addo\u00adve tale inden\u00adni\u00adt\u00e0 non copra inte\u00adgral\u00admen\u00adte il dan\u00adno effet\u00adti\u00adva\u00admen\u00adte sub\u00ec\u00adto, alla con\u00adces\u00adsio\u00adne di un risar\u00adci\u00admen\u00adto per dan\u00adni ulte\u00adrio\u00adri, pur\u00adch\u00e9 una sif\u00adfat\u00adta nor\u00adma\u00adti\u00adva non sfo\u00adci in un dupli\u00adce inden\u00adniz\u00adzo dell\u2019agente per la per\u00addi\u00adta di prov\u00advi\u00adgio\u00adni in segui\u00adto alla riso\u00adlu\u00adzio\u00adne di det\u00adto contratto. <\/span><\/p>\n

[\u2026]\n<\/p>

<\/a>37 Per quan\u00adto riguar\u00adda, in pri\u00admo luo\u00adgo, la neces\u00adsi\u00adt\u00e0, affin\u00adch\u00e9 l\u2019agente com\u00admer\u00adcia\u00adle abbia dirit\u00adto al risar\u00adci\u00admen\u00adto dei dan\u00adni, di un ille\u00adci\u00adto impu\u00adta\u00adbi\u00adle al pre\u00adpo\u00adnen\u00adte e del\u00adla sus\u00adsi\u00adsten\u00adza di un nes\u00adso cau\u00adsa\u00adle tra tale ille\u00adci\u00adto ed il dan\u00adno invo\u00adca\u00adto, occor\u00adre ricor\u00adda\u00adre, come risul\u00adta dal pun\u00adto 32 del\u00adla pre\u00adsen\u00adte sen\u00adten\u00adza, che la diret\u00adti\u00adva, ed in par\u00adti\u00adco\u00adla\u00adre il suo arti\u00adco\u00adlo 17, para\u00adgra\u00adfo 2, let\u00adte\u00adra c), non spe\u00adci\u00adfi\u00adca le con\u00addi\u00adzio\u00adni in pre\u00adsen\u00adza del\u00adle qua\u00adli l\u2019agente com\u00admer\u00adcia\u00adle ha dirit\u00adto al risar\u00adci\u00admen\u00adto dei dan\u00adni. Spet\u00adta per\u00adtan\u00adto agli Sta\u00adti mem\u00adbri sta\u00adbi\u00adli\u00adre, nel loro dirit\u00adto nazio\u00adna\u00adle, se la con\u00adces\u00adsio\u00adne del risar\u00adci\u00admen\u00adto dei dan\u00adni dipen\u00adda dall\u2019esistenza di un ille\u00adci\u00adto, sia esso con\u00adtrat\u00adtua\u00adle od extra\u00adcon\u00adtrat\u00adtua\u00adle, impu\u00adta\u00adbi\u00adle al pre\u00adpo\u00adnen\u00adte e che pre\u00adsen\u00adti un nes\u00adso cau\u00adsa\u00adle con il dan\u00adno invocato.<\/p>\n

<\/a>38 Ne con\u00adse\u00adgue che l\u2019articolo 17, para\u00adgra\u00adfo 2, let\u00adte\u00adra c), del\u00adla diret\u00adti\u00adva non subor\u00addi\u00adna la con\u00adces\u00adsio\u00adne del risar\u00adci\u00admen\u00adto dei dan\u00adni alla dimo\u00adstra\u00adzio\u00adne dell\u2019esistenza di un ille\u00adci\u00adto impu\u00adta\u00adbi\u00adle al pre\u00adpo\u00adnen\u00adte che pre\u00adsen\u00adti un nes\u00adso cau\u00adsa\u00adle con il dan\u00adno invo\u00adca\u00adto, n\u00e9, per\u00adtan\u00adto, alla natu\u00adra o alla gra\u00advi\u00adt\u00e0 di tale illecito.<\/p>\n

<\/a>39 Per quan\u00adto riguar\u00adda, in secon\u00addo luo\u00adgo, la que\u00adstio\u00adne se il risar\u00adci\u00admen\u00adto dei dan\u00adni deb\u00adba riguar\u00adda\u00adre un dan\u00adno distin\u00adto da quel\u00adlo risar\u00adci\u00adto dall\u2019indennit\u00e0 di clien\u00adte\u00adla, emer\u00adge sia dal\u00adla for\u00admu\u00adla\u00adzio\u00adne dell\u2019articolo 17, para\u00adgra\u00adfo 2, del\u00adla diret\u00adti\u00adva, sia dall\u2019impianto siste\u00adma\u00adti\u00adco di quest\u2019ultima, che la rispo\u00adsta a tale que\u00adstio\u00adne deve esse\u00adre affermativa.<\/p>\n

<\/a>40 Infat\u00adti, dall\u2019utilizzo di ter\u00admi\u00adni diver\u00adsi per indi\u00adca\u00adre i due ele\u00admen\u00adti del siste\u00adma dell\u2019indennit\u00e0 di clien\u00adte\u00adla, di cui all\u2019articolo 17, para\u00adgra\u00adfo 2, del\u00adla diret\u00adti\u00adva, ossia l\u2019\u00abindennit\u00e0\u00bb ed il \u00abrisar\u00adci\u00admen\u00adto dei dan\u00adni\u00bb, dal carat\u00adte\u00adre inte\u00adgra\u00adti\u00advo e facol\u00adta\u00adti\u00advo di quest\u2019ultimo, non\u00adch\u00e9 dal diver\u00adso gra\u00addo di armo\u00adniz\u00adza\u00adzio\u00adne pre\u00advi\u00adsto dal\u00adla diret\u00adti\u00adva rispet\u00adto a tali due ele\u00admen\u00adti, risul\u00adta che l\u2019indennizzo dell\u2019agente com\u00admer\u00adcia\u00adle attra\u00adver\u00adso il risar\u00adci\u00admen\u00adto dei dan\u00adni pu\u00f2 riguar\u00adda\u00adre sol\u00adtan\u00adto un dan\u00adno distin\u00adto da quel\u00adlo risar\u00adci\u00adto dall\u2019indennit\u00e0 di clien\u00adte\u00adla. Diver\u00adsa\u00admen\u00adte, ver\u00adreb\u00adbe aggi\u00adra\u00adto l\u2019importo mas\u00adsi\u00admo dell\u2019indennit\u00e0 pre\u00advi\u00adsto all\u2019articolo 17, para\u00adgra\u00adfo 2, let\u00adte\u00adra b), del\u00adla direttiva.<\/p>\n

<\/a>41 Di con\u00adse\u00adguen\u00adza, si deve con\u00adsta\u00adta\u00adre che la doman\u00adda di risar\u00adci\u00admen\u00adto dei dan\u00adni ai sen\u00adsi dell\u2019articolo 17, para\u00adgra\u00adfo 2, let\u00adte\u00adra c), del\u00adla diret\u00adti\u00adva deve ave\u00adre ad ogget\u00adto un dan\u00adno distin\u00adto da quel\u00adlo coper\u00adto dall\u2019indennit\u00e0 di clientela.<\/p>\n

<\/a>42 Alla luce del\u00adle con\u00adsi\u00adde\u00adra\u00adzio\u00adni che pre\u00adce\u00addo\u00adno, occor\u00adre rispon\u00adde\u00adre alla secon\u00adda ed alla ter\u00adza que\u00adstio\u00adne dichia\u00adran\u00addo che l\u2019articolo 17, para\u00adgra\u00adfo 2, let\u00adte\u00adra c), del\u00adla diret\u00adti\u00adva deve esse\u00adre inter\u00adpre\u00adta\u00adto nel sen\u00adso che la con\u00adces\u00adsio\u00adne del risar\u00adci\u00admen\u00adto dei dan\u00adni non \u00e8 subor\u00addi\u00adna\u00adta alla dimo\u00adstra\u00adzio\u00adne dell\u2019esistenza di un ille\u00adci\u00adto impu\u00adta\u00adbi\u00adle al pre\u00adpo\u00adnen\u00adte, che pre\u00adsen\u00adti un nes\u00adso cau\u00adsa\u00adle con il dan\u00adno invo\u00adca\u00adto, ma esi\u00adge che il dan\u00adno invo\u00adca\u00adto sia distin\u00adto da quel\u00adlo risar\u00adci\u00adto dall\u2019indennit\u00e0 di clientela.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/blockquote>\n

Leg\u00adge\u00adre la sen\u00adten\u00adza completa:<\/p>\n

C.G.U.E., 3 dicembre 2015, Quenon K. s.p.r.l c. Beobank s.a. e Metlife Insurance s.a.<\/em>, aff. C\u2011338\/14<\/a><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>

<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

La Cor\u00adte di Giu\u00adsti\u00adzia del\u00adl\u2019U\u00adnio\u00adne euro\u00adpea ha rispo\u00adsto a una que\u00adstio\u00adne pre\u00adgiu\u00addi\u00adzia\u00adle rela\u00adti\u00adva al dirit\u00adto bel\u00adga del con\u00adtrat\u00adto di agen\u00adzia com\u00admer\u00adcia\u00adle in una sen\u00adten\u00adza del 03\/12\/2015 sul cumu\u00adlo di risar\u00adci\u00admen\u00adto del\u00adl\u2019a\u00adgen\u00adte licenziato :<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":88459,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"quote","meta":{"wp_typography_post_enhancements_disabled":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[110],"tags":[309,310,98,111,290,307],"class_list":["post-115792","post","type-post","status-publish","format-quote","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-diritto-it","tag-agenzia","tag-contratti-distribuzione","tag-ue","tag-ue-it","tag-belgio","tag-contrats-de-distribution","post_format-post-format-quote"],"yoast_head":"\nC.G.U.E., 3 dicembre 2015, sentenza "Quenon" – AVOCAT GEOFFREY DELI\u00c9GE<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"it_IT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"C.G.U.E., 3 dicembre 2015, sentenza "Quenon" – AVOCAT GEOFFREY DELI\u00c9GE\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"La Cor\u00adte di Giu\u00adsti\u00adzia del\u00adl\u2019U\u00adnio\u00adne euro\u00adpea ha rispo\u00adsto a una que\u00adstio\u00adne pre\u00adgiu\u00addi\u00adzia\u00adle rela\u00adti\u00adva al dirit\u00adto bel\u00adga del con\u00adtrat\u00adto di agen\u00adzia com\u00admer\u00adcia\u00adle in una sen\u00adten\u00adza del 03\/12\/2015 sul cumu\u00adlo di risar\u00adci\u00admen\u00adto del\u00adl\u2019a\u00adgen\u00adte licenziato :\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"AVOCAT GEOFFREY DELI\u00c9GE\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/avocatdeliege\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/avocatdeliege\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-11-02T13:51:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-08-29T09:50:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/3516682090_b9587911c3_b.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"683\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Geoffrey DELI\u00c9GE\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"La Corte di Giustizia dell'Unione europea ha risposto a una questione pregiudiziale relativa al diritto belga del contratto di agenzia commerciale in una sentenza del 03\/12\/2015 sul cumulo di risarcimento dell'agente licenziato :\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@avocatdeliege\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@avocatdeliege\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Scritto da\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Geoffrey DELI\u00c9GE\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tempo di lettura stimato\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minuti\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/it\\\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/it\\\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Geoffrey DELI\u00c9GE\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/it\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cfd14211d3727f355d938796536b701c\"},\"headline\":\"C.G.U.E., 3 dicembre 2015, sentenza \u201cQuenon\u201d\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-11-02T13:51:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-08-29T09:50:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/it\\\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":725,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/it\\\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/3516682090_b9587911c3_b.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Agenzia commerciale\",\"Contratti di distribuzione\",\"UE - Droit de l'Union europ\u00e9enne\",\"UE\",\"Belgio\",\"Contrats de distribution\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Diritto\"],\"inLanguage\":\"it-IT\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/it\\\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/it\\\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\\\/\",\"name\":\"C.G.U.E., 3 dicembre 2015, sentenza \\\"Quenon\\\" – AVOCAT GEOFFREY DELI\u00c9GE\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/it\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/it\\\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/it\\\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/3516682090_b9587911c3_b.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-11-02T13:51:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-08-29T09:50:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/it\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cfd14211d3727f355d938796536b701c\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/it\\\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"it-IT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/it\\\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"it-IT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/it\\\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/3516682090_b9587911c3_b.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/3516682090_b9587911c3_b.jpg\",\"width\":1024,\"height\":683,\"caption\":\"C\u00e9dric Puisney, European Court of Justice - Grand courtoom (cc)\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/it\\\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Accueil\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/it\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Diritto\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/it\\\/category\\\/diritto-it\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"C.G.U.E., 3 dicembre 2015, sentenza \u201cQuenon\u201d\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/it\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/it\\\/\",\"name\":\"Avocat Geoffrey Deli\u00e9ge\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/it\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"it-IT\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/it\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cfd14211d3727f355d938796536b701c\",\"name\":\"Geoffrey DELI\u00c9GE\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"it-IT\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/201707-96x96.png\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/201707-96x96.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/201707-96x96.png\",\"caption\":\"Geoffrey DELI\u00c9GE\"},\"description\":\"Avocat au Barreau de Verviers (Belgique), il pratique depuis 2005 devant les juridictions belges pour repr\u00e9senter des clients internationaux (principalement italiens) et belges. Il a une exp\u00e9rience \u00e9tendue dans les mati\u00e8res civile et commerciale, concernant des litiges tr\u00e8s diversifi\u00e9s en droit des affaires, sp\u00e9cialement en mati\u00e8re de contrats de distribution et d\u2019affaires ayant un caract\u00e8re international.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/avocatdeliege.be\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/avocatdeliege\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/avocatdeliege\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"C.G.U.E., 3 dicembre 2015, sentenza \"Quenon\" – AVOCAT GEOFFREY DELI\u00c9GE","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\/","og_locale":"it_IT","og_type":"article","og_title":"C.G.U.E., 3 dicembre 2015, sentenza \"Quenon\" – AVOCAT GEOFFREY DELI\u00c9GE","og_description":"La Cor\u00adte di Giu\u00adsti\u00adzia del\u00adl\u2019U\u00adnio\u00adne euro\u00adpea ha rispo\u00adsto a una que\u00adstio\u00adne pre\u00adgiu\u00addi\u00adzia\u00adle rela\u00adti\u00adva al dirit\u00adto bel\u00adga del con\u00adtrat\u00adto di agen\u00adzia com\u00admer\u00adcia\u00adle in una sen\u00adten\u00adza del 03\/12\/2015 sul cumu\u00adlo di risar\u00adci\u00admen\u00adto del\u00adl\u2019a\u00adgen\u00adte licenziato :","og_url":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\/","og_site_name":"AVOCAT GEOFFREY DELI\u00c9GE","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/avocatdeliege","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/avocatdeliege","article_published_time":"2016-11-02T13:51:42+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-08-29T09:50:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":683,"url":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/3516682090_b9587911c3_b.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Geoffrey DELI\u00c9GE","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_description":"La Corte di Giustizia dell'Unione europea ha risposto a una questione pregiudiziale relativa al diritto belga del contratto di agenzia commerciale in una sentenza del 03\/12\/2015 sul cumulo di risarcimento dell'agente licenziato :","twitter_creator":"@avocatdeliege","twitter_site":"@avocatdeliege","twitter_misc":{"Scritto da":"Geoffrey DELI\u00c9GE","Tempo di lettura stimato":"4 minuti"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\/"},"author":{"name":"Geoffrey DELI\u00c9GE","@id":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/#\/schema\/person\/cfd14211d3727f355d938796536b701c"},"headline":"C.G.U.E., 3 dicembre 2015, sentenza \u201cQuenon\u201d","datePublished":"2016-11-02T13:51:42+00:00","dateModified":"2019-08-29T09:50:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\/"},"wordCount":725,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/3516682090_b9587911c3_b.jpg","keywords":["Agenzia commerciale","Contratti di distribuzione","UE - Droit de l'Union europ\u00e9enne","UE","Belgio","Contrats de distribution"],"articleSection":["Diritto"],"inLanguage":"it-IT"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\/","url":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\/","name":"C.G.U.E., 3 dicembre 2015, sentenza \"Quenon\" – AVOCAT GEOFFREY DELI\u00c9GE","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/3516682090_b9587911c3_b.jpg","datePublished":"2016-11-02T13:51:42+00:00","dateModified":"2019-08-29T09:50:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/#\/schema\/person\/cfd14211d3727f355d938796536b701c"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"it-IT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"it-IT","@id":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/3516682090_b9587911c3_b.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/3516682090_b9587911c3_b.jpg","width":1024,"height":683,"caption":"C\u00e9dric Puisney, European Court of Justice - Grand courtoom (cc)"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/cgue-sentenza-quenon\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Diritto","item":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/category\/diritto-it\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"C.G.U.E., 3 dicembre 2015, sentenza \u201cQuenon\u201d"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/#website","url":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/","name":"Avocat Geoffrey Deli\u00e9ge","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"it-IT"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/#\/schema\/person\/cfd14211d3727f355d938796536b701c","name":"Geoffrey DELI\u00c9GE","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"it-IT","@id":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/201707-96x96.png","url":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/201707-96x96.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/201707-96x96.png","caption":"Geoffrey DELI\u00c9GE"},"description":"Avocat au Barreau de Verviers (Belgique), il pratique depuis 2005 devant les juridictions belges pour repr\u00e9senter des clients internationaux (principalement italiens) et belges. Il a une exp\u00e9rience \u00e9tendue dans les mati\u00e8res civile et commerciale, concernant des litiges tr\u00e8s diversifi\u00e9s en droit des affaires, sp\u00e9cialement en mati\u00e8re de contrats de distribution et d\u2019affaires ayant un caract\u00e8re international.","sameAs":["https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/avocatdeliege","https:\/\/x.com\/avocatdeliege"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115792","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=115792"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115792\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":767826,"href":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115792\/revisions\/767826"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/88459"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=115792"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=115792"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/avocatdeliege.be\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=115792"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}